The shower is the first site of stratification, a tiled enclosure where the Body without Organs is forced into the grid of "femininity." Carrie White, hunching her posture to minimize her surface area of recording, is not merely a "shy girl"; she is a subject whose libidinal flows have been dammed up by the Abrahamic-Machine of her mother. When the blood begins to flow, it is not just a biological event—it is a "leak" in the social strata. The Barbie-doll mob, throwing tampons like stones, functions as a micro-fascist apparatus of "normalization." They are not just bullies; they are the "security guards of the Ego," ensuring that every body in the locker room conforms to the majoritarian model of the "Barbie." To be Carrie is to be the "deterritorialized" element that the system must either assimilate or annihilate.
I. The Abrahamic-Machine and the Uterus of the State
Margaret White is the "Despotic Signifier" in a house made of crosses and oven doors. Right from the birth canal, the scissors are raised—not as a tool, but as a "judgment." The decision to let Carrie live was not an act of "motherly love," but a "failed impalement," a pause in the divine machine that left Carrie in a state of "perpetual debt." Margaret does not see a child; she sees a "test of faith," a piece of flesh that must be constantly "re-territorialized" through scripture and closets. As Deleuze and Guattari (1983) observe in Anti-Oedipus:
"The family is the agent of psychic repression... it is the place where the desiring-machines are replaced by the technical machine of the social body."
Carrie’s knowledge of her own body is "foreclosed" by Margaret’s power. Power is not just "over" Carrie; it is the "stuff" out of which Carrie’s reality is constructed. By feeding her a mix of biblical jargon and psychotic-delusion, Margaret creates a "stratum" where thinking outside the mother's influence is synonymous with "sin" and "annihilation." This is the Foucaultian intersection of "Power/Knowledge": Margaret controls what Carrie is allowed to know, and therefore, what Carrie is allowed to be. The "nature versus nurture" binary is a trap; Carrie is an "assemblage" of genetic potential and religious-fascist capture.
II. The Prom as a Trap for Desiring-Production
When Carrie asks to go to the prom, she is attempting a "line of flight" toward the "Whole Person." But what is this "wholeness"? It is the desire to be "recorded" onto the social surface of the school. She wants to stop being "weird," which is to say, she wants to be "striated." She is caught between two networks of power: the mother-machine and the school-machine. She uses the "nice boy" (Tommy Ross) as a "bridge" to cross over into the world of the "Normal."
However, her desire for "wholeness" is a trap. She is equating her personal persona with a radical identification with the desires of others. As Lacan (1977) suggests, her desire is the "desire of the Other." She wants to be what the Gym Teacher (the "Good Mother" surrogate) and Tommy (the "Prince" surrogate) want her to be. Like termites in the foundation, the expectations of the "Barbies" have already hollowed her out. She can only feel "real" if she is verified by the social network. This is the tragedy of the subaltern: the only way out of the "closet" of the mother is into the "grid" of the high school royalty.
III. The Telekinetic-Machine: The Return of the Molecular
Carrie is no "broken toy." Beneath the subaltern rock, something is vibrating. The "Telekinetic-Machine" is the "revolutionary" element that cannot be contained by the social strata. It is a "deterritorialization" of the mind over matter. Carrie’s studies—her attempt to name the force inside her—represent a "becoming-molecular." She is moving from "being-a-victim" to "becoming-intensity."
The blood that falls at the prom is the "final catalyst." The bucket of pig's blood is a "symbolic castration," a ritualistic exclusion that attempts to turn the "Queen" back into the "Freak." But the "Freak" is the "nomad." In the recognition of her values being shattered, Carrie finds her "Rage." This is not "anger" in the psychological sense; it is "Rage" as a "political investigation." As Peter Sloterdijk (2014) argues in Rage and Time:
"The person who is en-raged in the highest form enters the world like a bullet enters the battle... Wherever rage flames up we are dealing with the complete warrior. As the burning hero enters fully into the fight, the identification of the human being with his driving forces realizes itself."
Carrie becomes the "bullet." The prom-machine, with its lights and streamers and hierarchy, is incinerated by the "pure flow" of her telekinetic desire. She is no longer "Carrie White, the girl who wants to fit in"; she is "The Fire," a "line of flight" that has turned into a "War Machine."
IV. The Destruction of the Visageity
The "Face" of the prom queen is the ultimate "white wall/black hole" of social faciality. By drenching Carrie in blood, the bullies attempted to "deface" her. Instead, they "un-faced" her. Carrie’s wide-eyed, blood-soaked stare is the "Zero Point" of faciality. She has moved beyond the "visage" of the human into the "haecceity" of the monster. She destroys the "Barbies" because they represent the "molar" world that refused to let her "become."
The fire she sets is not "evil"; it is a "deterritorialization" of the school-machine. The gym, the principal, the student body—they are all "strata" that must be melted down. The "American Woman's Day" celebration mentioned in the prompt finds its dark mirror here: Carrie is the "kick-butt woman" who has reached the "limit-experience." She has vomited up the "trashy cultural expectations" and the "dirty eyeballs" of the male-dominated hierarchy.
V. The Final Return: Re-Territorialization in the Grave
The film’s end—the hand reaching out from the grave—is the final "leak." Even after the mother-machine is destroyed (the "impaled" Margaret), and the school is burned, the "trace" of the subaltern remains. Carrie cannot be "properly" buried because her "line of flight" was too radical. She remains a "ghost" in the machine of the American suburb.
We must ask: was the remake a good idea? The "anti-remakers" are "anemic." They whine in a "puddle of collective impotence." The remake is just another "recording" on the surface of capital. But the story of Carrie is the story of the "revolutionary potential" of the repressed. If we "didn't eat the gibberish they fed us," we would find our own "telekinetic" response to the ecosystem of the already-rich. Carrie is the "bullet" that we are all waiting to fire at the dark flickering screen of our own complacency.
References
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1983). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Pantheon.
Lacan, J. (1977). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: Book XI. W. W. Norton & Company.
Nietzsche, F. (1887). On the Genealogy of Morals. Penguin Classics.
Sloterdijk, P. (2014). Rage and Time: A Political Investigation. Columbia University Press.
Žižek, S. (2008). Violence: Six Sideways Reflections. Picador.
Comments
Post a Comment